[WSF-Discuss] Romanticising Violence: A View from Pakistan
sukla.sen at gmail.com
Thu Apr 22 13:23:49 CDT 2010
By Tazeen Javed
April 22, 2010
Ever since Arundhati Roy published her long article recently in favour of
what the Indian government calls Maoist rebels, the Indian media and
blogosphere has quite unanimously denounced Roy, labelling her naive
admiration for the Maoists a proclivity towards “left-wing utopianism”.
Roy enraged a lot of Indians when she called very violent Maoists ‘Gandhians
with arms’ adherents of the philosophy of non violence consider this
sacrilegious. Just like Arundhati Roy, Pakistan has Imran Khan who supports
the Taliban and is critical of army operations in Swat and Fata. Like Roy,
Khan also believes that it is the circumstances that have turned
peace-loving tribals into warring security threats.
If you hear their arguments, they are almost identical. They both question
the legitimacy of a state to declare war against its own citizens, they both
think the state policies are responsible for the creation of the Taliban and
Maoists in their respective countries, and they both think that rebels are
essentially good people.
The modus operandi of the Taliban and the Maoists are similar. Both are
brutal and only believe in their own version of justice. Both conduct show
trials and execute whomever they deem guilty. Both use explosive devices
against government officials, police, army and common people. Both try to
control the supply lines in their respective areas.
Both recruit under-age boys, at times by force, and brainwash them into
carrying out operations. The situation in both the insurgency inflicted
areas is similar. People on both sides of the border have legitimate
grievances – 62 years into independence, their rights like access to water
and sewerage have been neglected by successive governments.
The parallels don’t just end here. If President Zaradri calls the Taliban
the ‘biggest security threat’ then Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has
called the Maoist threat the ‘gravest national security crisis’ India faces.
The Taliban in Pakistan and Maoists in India are lucky to find supporters in
Khan and Roy.
If Imran Khan is a firebrand speaker who can get college kids to support his
cause, then Roy’s reputation as a prize winning writer and activist lends
credo to the Maoist cause. If he speaks at left- wing forums in England and
regales them with tales of government atrocities against the Taliban, Roy
portrays a romantic image of the Maoists fighting the big bad government and
Imran Khan won the world cup for Pakistan in 1992 and Arundhati Roy won her
Booker prize in 1997. They may truly believe in the cause of the Maoists and
the Taliban or perhaps they always root for the underdog, but one must keep
in mind that it can also be a case of keeping the adulation of people alive
through taking up causes against the government.
Even though we live in times when non-state actors are considered
responsible for most of the chaos and terrorism, being anti state is still
considered cool. If you hear the arguments presented by Roy and Khan,
everything is either black or white but in politics and more so in power
politics, things are almost always grey.
The state has failed to address the issues of its people but even then, only
the state has the legitimacy to change it. Romanticising violence may win
Arundhati Roy and Imran Khan popularity, but it can never provide a long
lasting solution for peace.
Peace Is Doable
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the WorldSocialForum-Discuss