The Road to Atlanta:

Political and Historical Analysis of the US Social Forum Process to Date

April 2007, Michael Leon Guerrero, Tammy Bang Luu, Cindy Wiesner

This document is intended to provide some background on the US Social Forum (USSF) organizing process since its inception in 2004. It is important for us to understand how the process has evolved and the current challenges that we face in the last stretch towards the USSF.

We are now deep in the final stage in organizing the USSF – one that will require a full commitment from the National Planning Committee members to assure the event’s success. We made some important strides in the Chicago meeting in March. From this point the process will accelerate and expand rapidly. This is where the “fog of battle” begins to set in and it will become increasingly difficult for each of us to maintain a broad perspective on the entire process.

In this context we have some important objectives for the April 15-17 meeting:

  1. Clarity of Overall Program: We must leave the meeting with as clear a picture as possible as to what will happen on a day-to-day, hour-by-hour basis. There are many questions that many people have as they plan for their participation. The National Planning Committee (NPC) members should be able to answer them.
  2. Local and National Integration: We need a tighter level of integration between the work that the Atlanta Organizing Committee (AOC) is doing on the ground, and the work of the NPC.
  3. Communication and Cohesion: We need time for the Working Groups to continue to work together. We started a very effective process of integration in the March meeting in Chicago that we need to continue.
HISTORY: INITIATING THE PROCESS

During the early years of the World Social Forum, members of the WSF International Council (WSFIC) had been calling for a United States Social Forum. Some of the early participants in discussions with the WSFIC resisted the call, including Jobs with Justice and later the Grassroots Global Justice Alliance (GGJ). Our caution was based on the fact that there was not broad public awareness about the WSF process. If convened in the early years of the WSF, a USSF would not represent the broad diversity of the United States.

In the WSFIC meeting in Miami, FL in June of 2003, GGJ agreed to initiate discussions with organizations that had an organizing base to discuss the concept of a USSF. Two meetings were convened consecutively in April of 2004. The first was with roughly 50 community and labor organizing groups to gauge their interest in the USSF. The groups agreed that the forum could be a useful vehicle for building and strengthening U.S. social movements. The next meeting was with policy, advocacy and solidarity groups already involved in the social forum process that also agreed to support the USSF.

GGJ was asked to shepherd the process through its first stage of development – the formation of a national body to organize the forum. We established criteria that founding members of this body would be grassroots organizations that represented a constituency and membership base. We agreed that we would be deliberate in our outreach to assure that grassroots groups anchor the process and that policy, advocacy, academics and other sectors would be brought into the process later. The role of GGJ has often been confusing for people because of its role in initiating the process and the fact that several GGJ groups remain deeply involved in the process nationally.

Our initial objectives were 1) to be intentional in our outreach to grassroots groups rooted in working class communities of color and that we would broaden participation from that foundation 2) to assure that the USSF was not going to be an event but a movement building process 3) and that we had to be aware of our international responsibility, making local and global connections and that we were building an anti-imperialist movement within the U.S.

In August of 2004 a nomination process was completed with 22 organizations volunteering to serve on what was then known as the USSF Coordinating Committee (USSFCC) . The first USSFCC convened by conference call monthly and created some committees to carry out the initial work including establishing an application process for hosting the forum. An Executive Committee of 3 people was selected: Analia Penchazsadeh of Jobs with Justice, Colin Rajah of the National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, and Michael Leon Guerrero of Grassroots Global Justice.

In early 2005, the Site and Outreach Committee selected Atlanta, GA as the site of the first USSF. Administrative duties, including fiscal sponsorship, were transferred at that point from GGJ to Project South, the local host organization in Atlanta.

ATLANTA: THE FIRST FACE-TO-FACE MEETING

During the first half of 2005 the USSF structure went through a number of important changes. The Executive Committee proposed a restructuring to mirror the structure of the World Social Forum. This included the formation of most of the Working Groups that exist today: Communications, Culture, Fundraising, Outreach, Program and the Local Host Committee [1] . The process was opened to allow for more organizations to participate. Organizations who wanted to join the USSFCC still had to apply to join, but there were no requirements to join the Working Groups. In addition all USSFCC members were required to participate in the Working Groups.


[1] Moving Forward on the US Social Forum, Analia Penchazsadeh, May 2005


In August of 2005, a year after its founding, the USSF Coordinating Committee held its first face-to-face meeting. The USSFCC made additional significant changes to the structure. Working groups for Youth and Logistics were added. We also established a regional structure, designating 10 regions: Alaska, Northwest, Northeast, Rocky Mountains/Great Plains, Great Lakes/Midwest, Southeast, Pacific, West, Southwest and Caribbean. Each region would have a regional committee and develop its own process for mobilizing towards the USSF. Initial contacts were designated for each region.


The USSFCC was renamed the USSF National Planning Committee (NPC) , but a new version of the Coordinating Committee (CC) was also created. This was a subcommittee of the NPC with one representative from each of the working groups and regional committees. The CC was an expanded version of the Executive Committee and was intended to serve as more of a coordinating body. The discussions and planning in each of the working groups and committees would be brought here through their representatives. The NPC would still provide the overall political direction for the USSF process. The NPC set a goal of expanding its membership to 50 organizations by the end of 2005.

CHANGE OF DATE

At the Face-to-Face? meeting August 2006 was chosen as the date for the forum. Two weeks after the meeting, however, Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast and later Hurricane Rita. Tens of thousands of displaced people moved to Atlanta including many organizers. Local Host Committee organizations in Atlanta focused their attention on relief efforts. In the fall, the Southeast Regional Committee and the Local Host Committee recommended that the date of the USSF be moved to the summer of 2007.

OUR FIRST STAFF PERSON AND THE GROWTH OF THE REGIONAL PROCESSES

In January of 2006 a number of significant events took place. Alice Lovelace began work as the first staff person for the USSF with the title of Lead Staff Organizer. Alice brought her extensive experience in the movement, cultural work and in organizing large events. In mid-January, the Southeast Regional Committee (SEC) held a planning meeting in Atlanta, GA, with over 100 people and 40 groups attending. The organizations agreed to organize a broader meeting with a goal of 500 participants in the summer of 2006. This would become the Southeast Social Forum (SESF) . Durham, North Carolina was chosen as the site.

Later that month the 6th World Social Forum convened in two places, Bamako, Mali, and Caracas, Venezuela. A third “polycentric” forum was to take place in Karachi, Pakistan as well, but the event was postponed after a devastating earthquake hit the Kashmir region in November. At the Caracas WSF groups from Mexico and the southern border region of the U.S. held two meetings and agreed to organize a Border Social Forum and a mobilization against the Wall of Death in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. It was originally scheduled to be convened in May of 2006, but was later postponed to October.

AREAS OF STRUGGLE

In April, the Coordinating Committee met in Atlanta, GA. At the meeting the CC discussed major social upheavals that were taking place in the U.S.: The aftermath of the Gulf Coast hurricanes, the growing public opposition to the U.S. occupation of Iraq, the recent massive immigrant rights mobilizations which happened at the end of March. We also talked about the growing concern about climate change within the context of energy exploitation Native lands, particularly the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The impact of these movements touched on almost everyone in the U.S. However, they were developing in parallel, not together. We saw that the US Social Forum as a space to bring these areas of struggle together to deliberate and create greater integration and convergence. The CC decided that these 4 issues should be overarching themes for the forum.

DURHAM

The Southeast Social Forum on June 15-17 would mark a significant moment in the development of the USSF. Roughly 700 people participated. Groups throughout the region mobilized their memberships and constituencies. The majority of participants were people of color. Important discussions were held on developing Black-Brown? alliances. Plenary discussions were organized based on three of the overarching themes defined by the Coordinating Committee. The success of the event had ripple effects throughout the country. Groups that may have been skeptical of the Social Forum before began to see the value of the process.

NEW CHALLENGES TO THE STRUCTURE

Prior to the SESF the Coordinating Committee held a 2nd face-to-face meeting. At the meeting we discussed the growing importance of the regional processes, particularly in the Southeast and the Border region. As in the Southeast, the Border process was breaking down historical barriers between organizations and generating buy-in from organizations from the region. We recognized that there was a growing disconnect between the national process, where the participation of the NPC as a body was declining, and the participation of groups in some of the regions was increasing. Yet many of those groups were not involved in the national discussion.

The Coordinating Committee proposed a radical restructuring of the National Planning Committee, one that would reflect the new realities of participation in the USSF process. We proposed that rather than have a National Planning Committee and a Coordinating Committee, we would have one body. The Working Groups and Regional Committees would select this body, so those that are active in the process would serve on it. There would be 2 representatives elected from each of the Working Groups, and 3 from each region.

The Organizing Committee also proposed that 3 categories of participation be defined:

  1. Movement Builders – those organizations that will participate actively in the USSF Organizing Process,
  2. Movement Mobilizers – groups that will not be involved in the organizing (including the NPC, Working Groups and Regional Committees) but will organize their constituents to participate in the event.
  3. Organizational supporters – groups that will not organize or commit to attending but are willing to make a financial contribution.

We also created an endorsement form that would allow organizations to designate in which category they would like to serve.

The name of the Coordinating Committee was also changed at the Durham meeting to the Organizing Committee (OC) . The OC began to poll the NPC members about the proposed restructuring. We also wanted to gauge the commitment of NPC members to see if they were still willing to serve on the national body. Some groups declined due to capacity reasons. Other NPC organizations no longer existed. For the most part, however, we found that the NPC organizations were committed and active (see attached list of OC members).

THE INCREASING IMPORTANCE OF THE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE

During the course of 2006, the division of labor and decision-making roles between the Organizing Committee and the NPC became less clear. The NPC as a body was not active and as the OC took on more ongoing coordinating responsibility it grew in significance.

There are probably a number of reasons for this, partly because of capacity of each of the organizations participating in the OC. The distinction that we made in August of 2005 is that the NPC would define the overall political direction of the USSF; the OC will be an organizing body that works more directly with the staff. In reality, however, political decisions were made by the OC, some of which shaped the overall political direction.

This tension is not unique to the USSF. The Americas Social Forum has a similar structure and it struggles with the same questions. There is often overlap and some confusion as to the roles of each body. The World Social Forum International Council is also debating whether to form a Facilitation Group that will organize the often-loose process of the IC. The USSF CC felt it was critical to resolve this question at the next NPC meeting in October, 2006.

CIUDAD JUAREZ/EL PASO

In mid-October, 2006 roughly 1000 people attended the Border Social Forum in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico bringing the same spirit and energy that characterized Durham. The forum helped to consolidate participation not just in the Southwest United States but northern Mexico as well. Braceros and farmers were well represented and a march was organized to denounce the Wall of Death on the U.S.-Mexico border.

Immediately after the Border Social Forum, the National Planning Committee met for only the second time. We debated the NPC’s structure. Some members argued to expand the staff to coordinate the overall organizing process or to create a Secretariat that would fulfill this function. Others proposed to flatten the structure and eliminate the Organizing Committee in order to broaden participation and decision-making. In the end the latter proposal was adopted.

We also added new members to the NPC. Before the meeting Working Groups and Regional Committees had elected new co-chairs with the idea that they would serve on an expanded Organizing Committee.

We agreed that the next 8 months would require a concerted, dedicated effort by all NPC members and adopted a theme to characterize this 8 month stretch: The Road to Atlanta.

The decision to flatten the structure in some ways, however, set us back. To some it created a false sense of democracy, because the change did not create the surge in participation that was needed. Overall organizations did not step up and it left a gap because the process no longer had a committee to drive the overall organizing process. This cost us valuable organizing time over the next 8 weeks.

In early December, 2006 Tammy Bang Luu, Co-Chair? of the Outreach Working Group, Cindy Wiesner, Co-Chair? to the Outreach Working Group, Stephanie Guilloud, Representative of the Southeast Region, Rubén Sólis, Co-Chair? of the Southwest, Michael Leon Guerrero, Chair of the Fundraising Working Group and Alice Lovelace, National USSF Organizer met in Atlanta to develop a more detailed outreach strategy. Tammy, Cindy, Rubén and Stephanie committed to serve as an Outreach Engine that would drive the USSF outreach efforts. They would recommend to the NPC that a travel budget be established to allow the group to travel and help the development of the regional processes and strengthen participation by different sectors. They would also propose that a Native American Outreach Coordinator be hired for the duration of the USSF organizing process to strengthen Indigenous participation. The history of Indigenous participation and leadership in the Social Forum process has not been good historically. In order to address this for the USSF it was seen as vital to invest resources into Indigenous participation to assure ongoing outreach and coordination. In February, Heather Milton-Lightning?, former Indigenous Environmental Network Youth Organizer, was hired for this position.

THE IMBALANCE OF THE REGIONS

A number of regions are strong, particularly the Southeast and the Southwest, largely due to the success of the regional forums and a history of regional organizing. The Southeast region held a follow up planning meeting in February of 2007. The Northeast region is also moving with regional meetings in Amherst, MA and a citywide meeting in New York City. Organizers from the Boston Social Forum in 2004 continue to be active and help to anchor the regional process. Other regions are developing slowly. Meetings have been held with groups in Los Angeles and the Bay Area. People Organized to Win Employment Rights (POWER) agreed to serve as the regional anchor for the West (NV, UT, CA) and discussions have begun with the Outreach Engine for a regional strategy.

The Midwest (July 2006) and Chicago (May 2006) Social Forums had prior history to the USSF organizing. There has been an ongoing effort to integrate these processes into the overall national organizing. One of the main reasons for holding the NPC March meeting in Chicago was to help boost the Midwest USSF organizing and build relations with the people previously organizing social forums. In attendance at the NPC meeting were representatives of the Midwest Social Forum. The Outreach Engine co-sponsored with Carlos Fernandez of JwJ-? Chicago a Midwest outreach strategy meeting and a USSF informational meeting in Chicago, with a total of over 70 participants.

Fallout from the collapse of the Northwest Social Forum (NWSF) in 2004 has made it difficult to bring people together in the region, although groups involved in the organizing of the NWSF are active in the USSF process. Groups in Oregon are also beginning to get involved. Padres y Jovenes Unidos from Denver joined the National Planning Committee and attended the March, 2007 meeting of the NPC. This was an important step in helping to consolidate participation of the Rocky Mountain/Plains region. In addition, the Center for Community Change is applying to join the NPC in April and has committed Bineshi Albert, field organizer for the Rocky Mountain/Plains region as their primary representative.

In November of 2006 we helped to address a major gap in our outreach. Rubén Solís of Southwest Workers Union attended the Puerto Rico Social Forum and met with the Organizing Committee. Puerto Rico and the Caribbean region will now have representation on the NPC.

Forums were also held in Maine and Houston. At the beginning of March, organizers on the NPC in the Washington D.C. area convened a successful DC Metro Social Forum attended by over 230 people. This helped consolidate participation by both grassroots groups, as well as policy and advocacy groups in the Beltway.

There are discussions that have begun in Guam and Hawaii, but no one from the region has officially been brought on to anchor the process, although DMZ Hawaii has agreed to help anchor the process. The Pacific region will face huge challenges in terms of resources to organize and effectively participate in the national process. Similar challenges face the Alaska region. RedOil? has also joined the NPC and had a representative at the March 2007 meeting for the first time. In the next few weeks, it will be critical to strengthen the relationships and capacity to mobilize the regions where we are weakest.

INVOLVING MORE SECTORS

Participation by some sectors has also been slow in developing, particularly labor. This is due in part to the split of the AFL-CIO in 2005. The internal struggle made it difficult to have discussions with any of the unions about the USSF. This is slowly starting to shift, largely due to the efforts of Jobs with Justice. Sarita Gupta has played a big role in reaching out to the national unions, and Carlos Fernandez of Chicago JwJ is also helping to anchor the Midwest. Charlie Fleming, President of the Atlanta Central Labor Council and Fred Azcarate (formerly with JwJ, now with the AFL-CIO) are playing leadership roles in encouraging AFL-CIO participation. Other unions, locals and labor councils have also expressed a willingness to be supportive but have yet to make a concrete commitment. At the December meeting a Labor Working Group (Including independent worker organizations, AFL-CIO, Change to Win, Worker Networks) was established, and the impact of neo-liberalism on the working class was added as one of the core issues. This means that the NPC will organize a plenary session on this topic.

Similarly, we talked about the role of faith-based organizations. There has been some interest in establishing a Faith Working Group, and there have been discussions with organizations about leading this effort. In the October 2006 NPC meeting we also affirmed the formation of the Women’s Working Group. This grew out of local organizing efforts in Atlanta driven by SisterSong?.

The Outreach Engine has met with United for Peace and Justice and we can look forward to participation of the peace movement. The met with Center for Community Change and recruited them onto the NPC. They also have been meeting with the Palestinian Solidarity Movement, which is organizing a presence at the forum. There have also been inroads with LGBTT leaders and organizations to integrate queer issues into the USSF. Richard Moore of the Southwest Network for Environmental and Economic Justice has been meeting with a number of the conservation and environmental organizations. So the process is growing.

NPC MEETING DECEMBER, 2006 - CRUNCH TIME

In addition to the focus on outreach and communications, the fourth meeting of the National Planning Committee can be characterized by emphasis on:

  1. Addressing the specific tasks that the NPC would take responsibility for. This includes organizing the plenaries on the 5 core issues, organizing the opening and closing ceremonies and concerts, and the opening march.
  2. Assuring accountability of NPC members. At this critical stage we had to make sure that all NPC members will be able to follow through with the commitments that they have taken on.
  3. Addressing our basic needs. At the time we still lacked meeting space, volunteers and money to achieve all of our organizing goals.
  4. Affirming the political principles and movement building goals for the USSF – Although we have general unity on the concepts of movement building and convergence, we still have not finalized how this will happen at the USSF. This is a conversation carried over to the March meeting.

To address the first issue, several new working teams were formed to address these specific needs. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was drafted and circulated at the meeting and in the weeks following, outlining the expectations of NPC members. Few NPC members signed the MOU. Several raised concerns about the potential financial liability that their organizations would be committing to. This especially came up around the issue of hotels and meeting space. The USSF had to commit to two primary hotels – the Westin and the Marriott downtown – in which we could fill large blocks of rooms in order to secure the use of meeting space. If the rooms are not rented out, it could result in a significant liability to the organization that signed the contract with the hotel. In the end Project South and SisterSong? agreed to sign the contracts for the respective hotels.

Although the MOU is viewed more as a document reflecting political and organizational commitment, there was concern that it would lock organizations into financial responsibility for the USSF as well. Some members are drafting their own documents that express their commitment to the process in lieu of signing the MOU.

THE A-TEAM - PITY THE FOOLS

The other new body that was created at the December 2006 NPC meeting was the Accountability Team (A-Team) . This was formed to address the gap in overall coordination that was created when the NPC structure was “flattened” in October. The A-Team? is a small core of 4 people: Alice Lovelace, National USSF Organizer, Allison Budschalow of American Friends Service Committee, Michael Leon Guerrero, Grassroots Global Justice Alliance and Cindy Wiesner, Miami Workers Center, this team coordinates the overall process – setting up NPC conference calls and preparing agendas, addressing immediate issues that need resolution. The A-Team? works with Alice to make short term coordinating decisions or defines a process for decisions that must be made by the NPC or other bodies. This group meets by conference call on a weekly basis.

CHICAGO – THE 100 DAY COUNTDOWN

We made important strides in the fifth meeting of the NPC in March 2007. Convening the meeting in Chicago was crucial and strategic for us to be able to consolidate participation of the Midwest. The meeting was hosted by Chicago Jobs with Justice and convened at the offices of UNITE/HERE. Some of the most important achievements of the meeting were:

  1. To begin to strengthen the integration of the Working Groups. Each of the groups had been working largely in isolation, and the organizing process had developed to a point where each group had to coordinate with others. We held a very successful “Speed Dating” exercise where each of the groups was able to meet with the others and identify areas of need and coordination.
  2. Develop tools to affirm the commitment of NPC member organizations: The MOU was replaced by 2 documents: a Roles and Responsibility Agreement which spells out the political commitment of each organization to the USSF organizing process, and a Financial Resources Pledge and Process form. The Pledge form allows the organizations to specify their commitments to help raise money in the areas of Individual Donors, Organizational Registration and Foundations. In addition, the form allows the organization to declare an amount of liability for which they are willing to take responsibility. These documents seem to have helped us overcome important political hurdles.
  3. To update our budget priorities anticipating a shortfall in revenue and we developed a broad-based, collective strategy to raise resources.
  4. To give more clarity to the framework for the agenda. Although significant questions remain, we have a sense of what the opening march will be, start and end times for the opening and closing sessions, and timeframes for the plenaries.
  5. To begin to be more grounded politically. We achieved some level of consensus on the goals for the forum, although there is still much work to be done in this area.
  6. To add new members. The Michigan Welfare Rights Union, Border Agricultural Workers Union and the Peoples Institute for Survival and Beyond in New Orleans were voted on as new members. In addition, the AFL-CIO and UNITE/HERE Midwest Joint Board also subsequently joined in April.
OUTSTANDING CHALLENGES

There are some critical issues that we began to address in Chicago that must be resolved in the April meeting.

  • Translation/Interpretation – This situation is in crisis. The Language Access Committee convened in Chicago and developed a proposal for coordination of translation/interpretation. Hilary Klein from Oakland, has since agreed to serve in the role of coordinator for the team. There are outstanding financial and technical questions that must be resolved by the NPC in this area.
  • Plenaries are a potentially contentious issue – particularly the questions of composition and content. How do we develop the plenaries so that they help to foster greater convergence among different sectors, issues, geographies, ethnicities, ages, etc.
  • Communications – There are some gaps that still remain to be addressed in the area of communications. Particularly the need for articles to be written about the USSF in advance of the forum.
  • Resource Mobilization – It is unlikely that we will receive much more funding support than the current pending commitments. Strengthening our resource mobilization efforts using other strategies will be key from this point.
  • Volunteers - We are in desperate need of someone who can mobilize volunteers for the USSF. This is a critical need that must be addressed ASAP.
  • Housing – The availability of affordable housing, particularly Solidarity Housing is also a serious issue for many delegates who are coming.
  • July 2 – We need to begin the discussion about the next steps and vision for after the USSF.

These are just some of the important challenges that we must address in the April meeting and in coming weeks. We can look forward to the participation of new members such as the AFL-CIO and UNITE/HERE Midwest Joint Board. We also have pending applications from Ruckus Society and the Center for Community Change.

BRINGING IT HOME TO ATLANTA

There is a lot of excitement building for the USSF. Registrations are starting to pick up. Many organizations are beginning to plan their participation on a mass level. Some are organizing large delegations including bus tours leading to the USSF. SouthWest? Organizing Project developed a short video ad that is now on the website. Networks like American Friends Services Committee are planning pre-USSF convenings in Atlanta. Other folks like Right to the City (national anti-gentrification alliance) are planning a gathering at the USSF. Jobs with Justice will be celebrating its 20 year anniversary at the USSF. The Alston-Bannerman? Program is proposing to give a lifetime achievement award to Harry Belafonte. Some groups are planning a soccer tournament, others a film festival, others a rap concert. These are some of the exciting activities that give the social forums their unique and inspiring character. There will be much more to come in the next 2 months. This will be a monumental effort, let us take our place with the global movement.

To make Another World is Possible, Another U.S. is Necessary!!!

USSF National Planning Committee (as of March 15, 2007)

1. 50 Years is Enough (Washington, DC) 2. Alternate ROOTS (Atlanta, GA) 3. American Federation of Labor-Congress? of Industrial Organizations (Washington, DC) 4. American Friends Service Committee (Philadelphia, PA) 5. Border Agricultural Workers Union (El Paso, TX) 6. CAAAV: Organizing Asian Communities (New York, NY) 7. Center for Social Justice(Seattle, WA) 8. Center for Third World Organizing (Oakland, CA) 9. Farm Labor Organizing Committee (Toledo, OH) 10. Grassroots Global Justice Alliance (Los Angeles, CA) 11. Independent Progressive Politics Network (Bloomfield, NJ) 12. Indigenous Environmental Network (Bemidji, MN) 13. Indigenous Women's Network (Minneapolis, MN) 14. Jobs with Justice (Washington, DC) 15. Labor/Community Strategy Center (Los Angeles, CA) 16. Miami Workers Center (Miami, FL) 17. Michigan Welfare Rights Union (Detroit, MI) 18. National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (Oakland, CA) 19. North American Alliance for Fair Employment (Boston, MA) 20. NYC AIDS Housing Network (Brooklyn, NY) 21. Padres Unidos (Denver, CO) 22. People Organizing to Demand Environmental & Economic Rights (San Francisco, CA) 23. People Organized to Win Employment Rights (San Francisco, CA) 24. Peoples Institute for Survival and Beyond (New Orleans, LA) 25. Poor Peoples Economic Human Rights Campaign (Philadelphia, PA) 26. Praxis Project (Washington, DC) 27. Project South (Atlanta, GA) 28. RedOil? (Alaska) 29. Service Employees International Union (Washington, DC) 30. SHAWL Society (Seattle, WA) 31. Sister Song (Atlanta, GA) 32. Southwest Network for Environmental and Economic Justice (Albuquerque, NM) 33. SouthWest? Organizing Project (Albuquerque, NM) 34. Southwest Workers Union (San Antonio, TX) 35. St. Peter's Housing Committee (San Francisco, CA) 36. Taskforce for the Homeless (Atlanta, GA) 37. Third World Majority (Oakland, CA) 38. Transafrica Forum (Washington, DC) 39. UNITE/HERE Midwest Joint Board(Midwest Office, Chicago, IL) 40. United Students Against Sweatshops (Washington, DC) 41. Women Watch Afrika (Atlanta, GA) 42. Youth Media Council (Oakland, CA)

Pending Applications in April

Center for Community Change (Washington, DC) Ruckus Society (Oakland, CA)

USSF ORGANIZING COMMITTEE (2006)

JOSE T. BRAVO Just Transition Alliance

MÓNICA CÓRDOVA SWOP

REV. KENNETH GLASGOW The Ordinary People Society

TOM GOLDTOOTH Indigenous Environmental Network

MICHAEL LEON GUERRERO Grassroots Global Justice

GLORY KILANKO Women Watch Afrika

GERNARO LOPEZ-RENDON RUBEN SOLIS Southwest Workers Union

ALICE LOVELACE USSF National Lead Staff Organizer

TAMMY BANG LUU Labor/Community Strategy Center

COLIN RAJAH National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights

JEROME SCOTT Project South

SARA TOTONCHI Southern Center for Human Rights

3. We Believe

First page Previous page page:2/3 Next page Last page